MCS evolutions: New AIS patern

  1. Accueil
  2. > MCS evolutions
  3. > New AIS patern

From Tracking Ships to Tracking "Intent" : new AIS patern

MarineTraffic told you where a ship was. Kpler uses the combined data to tell you why it’s there.

The "Dark Fleet" Precision : With the integration completed in 2025, Kpler’s algorithms now cross-reference satellite AIS with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and optical imagery. This allows them to "see" vessels that have turned off their transponders for illicit Ship-to-Ship (STS) transfers with a precision that was impossible two years ago.

Consolidation of the "Truth"

Previously, MarineTraffic and FleetMon often had slightly different positions or ETAs for the same vessel due to different receiver networks.

  • Unified Network : Kpler now operates a consolidated network of over 13,000 receivers  (combining the MarineTraffic and FleetMon communities).
  • The Accuracy Jump : By merging these disparate data points into a single "Kpler AIS" source, they’ve eliminated the data noise. In 2026, their ETA predictions for major ports like Rotterdam or Singapore are now cited as having an error margin of less than 30 minutes for vessels within 48 hours of arrival.

See aswell my articles on AIS topics :

The New Hierarchy

Feature Old MarineTraffic Kpler (2026)
Primary Source Community Terrestrial AIS Owned Satellite + 13k Terrestrial Nodes
Latency 5–15+ mins (Open Ocean) Sub-minute (Global)
Data Focus Vessel Location Cargo Flow + Trade Intent
AI Integration Basic ETA Predictive Compliance & Market Impact

I must highlight that ORBCOMM’s solutions are more oriented toward tankers and commercial shipping than the fishing industry. Their recent strategic alignment with S&P Global, focus on supply chain intelligence and the technical nature of their data.

Since 2025, ORBCOMM’s AIS business has been integrated into S&P Global Market Intelligence.

  • The Logic : S&P Global is a giant in financial analytics, credit ratings, and commodity markets. They didn’t buy ORBCOMM to track individual fishing boats ; they bought it to track global energy flows (oil/gas tankers) and commodity movements (bulk carriers).
  • Argument : Focus on how the data is used for risk assessment and market intelligence rather than ecological or fisheries management.

Focus on "Supply Chain Visibility" vs. "Fisheries Management"

ORBCOMM’s marketing and product development are explicitly tied to IoT and intermodal logistics.

  • Tanker Focus : Their solutions emphasize "Supply Chain Visibility," "Energy Transition," and "Cargo Integrity." These are critical for the tanker and container markets where the value of the cargo is high and the timing (ETA) affects global markets.
  • Fishing Absence : Unlike competitors (like Spire, which heavily promotes its work with Global Fishing Watch), ORBCOMM’s primary maritime messaging centers on compliance, maritime security, and logistics.
  • Contrast : While a fishing vessel needs "activity detection" (is it fishing or just moving ?), a tanker needs "route optimization" and "ETA prediction"—which is where ORBCOMM excels.

Technical Positioning : Class A vs. Class B AIS

The regulatory focus of ORBCOMM’s data is often tied to IMO mandates.

  • The Fact : The International Maritime Organization (IMO) mandates AIS primarily for ships over 300 GT (Gross Tonnage)—which includes almost all tankers but excludes a massive portion of the global fishing fleet.
  • The Point : ORBCOMM’s network is optimized for the high-reliability Class A AIS used by large commercial vessels. While they can track fishing boats, their infrastructure and the resulting analytics (integrated with S&P Global’s financial data) are designed to serve the institutional traders and shipowners of the merchant fleet.

How can Global Fishing Watch (GFW) withstand the Kpler giant ?

The risk of GFW "disappearing" is low in the short term because its existence, unlike Kpler’s, does not depend on commercial profitability.

  • GFW’s Model : Supported by foundations (Bloomberg, Moore, Postcode Lottery) and technology partners like Google Cloud. Its budget is tied to philanthropy and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
  • Kpler’s Model : Focused on ROI (return on investment) for traders and shipowners.

As long as ocean transparency remains a climate and geopolitical priority, GFW’s funding will likely remain stable.

The Challenge of Raw Data Access

This is where Kpler poses a major challenge. By absorbing Spire Maritime, Kpler now controls one of the world’s largest AIS satellite constellations.

  • The Risk for GFW : If private data providers (such as Kpler or Orbcomm/S&P) massively increase the price of raw AIS feeds, GFW’s operational costs could skyrocket.
  • GFW’s Counter-strategy : GFW is diversifying its sources. They no longer rely solely on AIS, but also use Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and optical imaging (VIIRS) to spot "dark vessels" (those that turn off their AIS). These technologies are increasingly accessible through government space partnerships (e.g., Copernicus in Europe).

Specialization as a Survival Strategy

GFW is not seeking to compete with Kpler in the fields of oil or gas logistics. Instead, GFW focuses on niches where the private sector invests little :

  • Illegal Fishing (IUU) : Kpler cares little about this, except from a compliance risk perspective.
  • Forced Labor at Sea : GFW is developing unique algorithms to detect human rights violations—data that has no direct market value for Kpler’s clients.
  • Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) : GFW provides free monitoring tools to developing states that lack the means to afford a Kpler subscription.

The Risk of Technical "Marginalization"

The real danger for GFW is not disappearance, but technological marginalization. With the computing power and exclusive data from Spire and FleetMon, Kpler can produce faster, more accurate analytics. If GFW is restricted to public or low-quality AIS data, its scientific credibility could be challenged compared to the industry standards set by Kpler.

Moving Toward a Two-Tier Model :

  • 1. Kpler is becoming the "Bloomberg of the Sea" : subscription-based, ultra-precise, and indispensable for business and finance.
  • 2. GFW is becoming the "Public Service of the Ocean" : free, focused on ecology and the law, and indispensable for NGOs and regulators.

Paradoxically, the merger of private players (Kpler/Spire, Orbcomm/S&P) is pushing some governments to increase their support for GFW to prevent a total private monopoly on the surveillance of national waters.

IS THERE COMPETITION BETWEEN KPLER AND UNSEENLABS ?"

Competition between Kpler  and Unseenlabs  is real, but it exists at the intersection of two different technological approaches. Although both companies sell "clarity" regarding maritime activity, they use different tools to achieve it.

  • Kpler (AIS Dominance) : Following the acquisition of Spire Maritime and MarineTraffic Kpler has become the giant of AIS (Automatic Identification System) data. AIS relies on radio messages sent voluntarily by vessels.
  • Unseenlabs (RF Specialist) : Conversely, Unseenlabs does not depend on AIS. They capture passive Radio Frequency (RF) signals emitted by a ship’s navigation radars.

The "Dark Fleet" Segment : The Point of Friction :

The Problem : A vessel engaged in illicit activities (illegal fishing, sanction evasion, ship-to-ship oil transfers) will turn off its AIS transponder to become "invisible."
The Kpler Solution : Uses algorithms and satellite imagery to infer suspicious behavior and identify "gaps" in AIS trajectories.
The Unseenlabs Solution : Continues to "see" the vessel through its RF signature, even when the AIS is switched off.